Abortion: Where do Pro-lifers go from Here?

Throughout the past four years the pro-lifers, including our outspoken president George W. Bush have tirelessly and uncompromisingly fought for an overturning of the 1989 Roe v. Wade decision. With a marginally conservative Congress and very supportive president, it seemed that if ever the possibility was realistic, it was then. Yet, despite their valiant and constant efforts, somehow, the right to lifers seemed to miss their eight year window of opportunity to right the wrongs of what they saw as national murder. Indeed this reality must have come as a shocking blow, yet undoubtedly the future is sure to lower pro-life confidence levels even more. As we are all well aware, both the law making and law enforcing branches of government have been freshly reorganized to take on a new and unsympathetic attitude toward the pro-life movement. In short, the future seems dim...

With little to no hope for overriding Roe V. Wade or even limiting the availability of abortions to the public, what is the pro-life camp to do? Most of those who hold this anti-abortion viewpoint draw it from very deep spiritual or ethical convictions that will not be easily compromised. However, few promising options will be offered for pro-lifers for at least four years, probably more. To many, it would be an unrealistic, unproductive, and ultimately wasteful endeavor to continue to fight for something that simply can not happen. These pragmatics offer more reasonable options. Drawing from the statistic that clearly links abortion to poverty, they suggest that pro-lifers divert their efforts to social, rather than legal battles. They argue that if poverty were limited, abortions would in turn decrease.

In my opinion, this suggestion on it's own is a good one. It can not be disproved that more abortions occur in places where mothers have fewer financial options. Undoubtedly increased emphasis on social justice would limit the number of abortions annually, ultimately saving hundreds, even thousands of lives. Indeed the results of this very tangible possibility are obvious and promising. For this reason I feel that, given new political circumstances, this new avenue needs to be further explored. However, this does not mean that the seemingly impossible goal of eliminating the practice of abortion should be abandoned. All social movements suffer setbacks, but only those that persevere ultimately succeed.

What's With The Dog?

Now it may just be me and my innate unfamiliarity with the post election intentions of president elects, but throughout the past week I have found myself increasingly enthralled with the amount of cold hard print, web space and airtime that have been so outlandishly devoted to the supposedly pressing question of naming the promised and long awaited presidential pooch. I have repeatedly found this topic making headlines all over the media, taking its place among articles discussing such pressing national controversies as the economic crisis, war in the Middle East, and the proposed Fairness Doctrine. As a proud dog owner I can certainly enthusiastically relate to the Obama family and their anticipation of their very first pawed pet. Indeed they should continue to joyously proclaim their search for that perfect puppy. However, I just can't help but wonder if the front page is the best place to do it.

In his prophetic book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, the late author and media expert Dr. Neil Postman addressed the pressing problem of a growing number of simply irrelevant and unnecessary news items that the media chooses flash before us day after day. His reason for this influx of "junk" information is the media's late shift toward an entertainment industry. They have made it their primary goal to provide a source of sensory stimulation, not productive discourse. In my opinion this entire discussion regarding Obama's dog search is just that. Sure, it may tug at the heartstrings of some Americans and impress those dog lovers in the crowd. However, I believe this topic is taking up space in the media that should be reserved for more pressing matters. The president is adopting a dog. Good for him! Moving on.....

Where is the American Political Center?

As the great American political bandwagon is finally coming to a gradual temporary halt with the closure of the election season, the nation is at last finding itself able to pause and look back on the events of the past year in a more reflective tone. While the political game was on, it seemed that the distracting whirlwind of propaganda, hype and partisanism made realistic contemplation near impossible for many of us. Now that the dust seems to be settling, Americans are finally beginning to ask the long postponed question: so what? I choose to use this particular question, not only because it is the carefully chosen title of this blog, but because in my opinion, it represents the search for the deep implications and effects of the events which occupy our lives.

In the case of our now changed political environment, the question "so what?" is being asked by Americans everywhere; across all social categories, cultural lines, belief systems and political associations. The citizens of this nation know that history has been made. They know that this new America is not the America that it was a year ago. There has been a shift, political, ideological, ethical, toward something new. The inquiry that remains unanswered is exactly what direction the nation has shifted toward, and how this shift will effect the very uncertain future.

Some feel that the shift is obvious and permanent, symbolized by Obama's earth shattering election. Many engaged in this national conversation, such as journalists E. J. Dionne of The Washington Post, and John Judis of The New Republic. They believe that this year's election results strongly affirm their conjecture that the United States has confidently shifted its political center from the right to the left. In their opinions, "this year's election marked a fundamental "realignment," as the Republican base of older blue-collar and rural whites shrank to a minority," giving way to a new Democratic majority "composed of college educated professionals; working and single women; blacks, Hispanics, and Asians; and people under 30." In their view, Obama could not have been realistically elected in an America identified by a traditional, right centered leaning.

On the other hand, many by viewing the most recent exit poles have come to disagree. The poles show that 22% of registered voters identified themselves as liberals, while 34% claimed a conservative identity. The remaining 44% considered themselves moderates. According to these statistics, the numbers remained virtually the same as those observed during the 2004 election period. These less convinced citizens, including journalists Rod Dreher of Realpolitics.com and Rich Lowry of the Washington Post, feel that the true motivation for the election results was simple dissatisfacion with the republican party and President Bush, not a central political shift.

I tend to agree with journalist Steven M. Wharshawsky, a writer for the American Thinker. His conclusion is that it is simply too soon to tell. Noting the large, unignorable presence of those "wishy washy" unidentified moderates, Wharshawsky insists that there is a large number of Americans who simply do not fit in a cookie cutter partisan identity. They are caught somewhere in the middle. It would seem that apparently we are as well. I guess we will just have to wait a bit longer for that dust to settle...

This week's article discovered in the November 21, 2008 issue of The Week magazine.

Those Ten Commandments Again...

It would seem that yet again that pervasive issue of the presence of religious symbols on government property has reared it's ugly head in another small town. As recorded in a recent Washington Post editorial titled 'The Seven Aphorisms,' the small town of Pleasant Grove City, Utah is being opposed by a minority colic group known as the Summum, who believe the town is unfairly favoring Christianity by choosing to maintian a "10 Commandments" monument while decling their offer to erect a monument commemorating their religious texts. The town's hall has been embellished with numerous historical and culturally relevant monuments for decades. According to the town, these monuments are placed for the specific purpose of commemorating the many historic forces that took part in it's formation and growth.

By description, this town appears to be like most others. It is a town that has been shaped by many contributing organizations and groups. One such institution that has had an immense part in forming this city is the church. This should come at no large surprise. The hand of the church in American community growth has proven common in most other American cities as well. Indeed, one would face a great challenge in seeking to find even one town in their travels across the U.S.A that does not contain at least one Christian church. It is an indisputatble fact that the Church has been among the strongest and most accomplished institutions in fostering positive community growth throughout American history. The town of Pleasant Grove City is undoubtedly no exception.

Yes, when one addresses the issue regarding the presence of religious symbols on public property, there are a host of considerations that need to be made. Some of these include freedom of expression, separation of church and state, religious discrimination and equal representation of social groups. One could discuss and debate these issues for hours on end, but unfortunately I don't have hours (you probably don't either) and I only wish to address a few undisputable facts that I believe play a large role in the understanding of this particular case.

The fact remains that the mainstream Christian church has for many centuries been and continues to remain an influential presence in the town of Pleasant Grove City. The disputed symbolic monument displays the 10 Commandments, which were (and believe it or not largely still are) absolutely foundational principles of American society. Pleasant Grove City's monument attests to this fact, having been erected on the property now for nearly half a century. Religion aside, there is enough empirical information here to prove the continued importance of this monument to the community as a representation of the town's orgin.

Have you ever heard of the Summum? Congratulations if you have, and don't feel bad if you haven't. The Summum is a marginal minority group that has only existed for a few decades in the town of Pleasant Grove City. Outside of the state of Utah, it is nearly unknown. The historical contributions to the town and the nations are inarguably minimal. Why then do they deserve a place on the Town Hall lawn? If every minute special interest group were to be granted representation at their town hall, undoubtedly the lawn itself would soon be invisible under the piles of potential monuments that could be erected. Relevance and practicality should be the deciding factors in such debates of symbolic display on public property. Sorry Summom, but the line needs to be drawn somewhere.

2.89.....and Dropping?

I don't get out much. This inevitable fact faces a writer who currently sits in his room in the middle of the practically invisible little town of Houghton NY. This town is completely enveloped by the rolling, (and in some cases tumbling) hills of the Allegany mountains. In order to reach a location of any cultural or geographical significance at all, I would need to plan on traveling for at least 45 minutes by car. I believe the easiest way to illustrate my innate isolation is to admit that the nearest Wal-Mart is an entire hour away.

While I have come to treasure the immense land barrier that separates myself from civilization, I have found that it does, as with most circumstances, have its disadvantages. One small example of such a disadvantage is the lost ability to follow current gasoline prices as I used to. If I am fortunate enough to leave the fine village of Houghton at all during my week, I will find myself even more fortunate to happen upon a gas station in my travels. Because of this slight hindrance, I am most likely somewhat off in my current gasoline price estimates, but based upon last observation, I have found them to have reached the seemingly glorious level of only $2.89 per gallon. Undoubtedly, if this is close to the current price of gasoline here in Houghton, I can be assured that it has fallen even lower in many other states including my home state of New Jersey. This recent downward trend has come as a tremendous relief to countless Americans facing the busy Christmas season and and an impending cold long winter.

This $2.89 astonishment has caused me to question, what exactly are the causes of this drastic price change? I received at least some insight into this question upon reviewing a recent issue of The Week magazine. The article, curiously titled 'OPEC: Trying to Set a Floor Under Prices,' seemed to view these staggering price drops with a "too much, too fast" outlook. It would seem that experts are very worried about the roller coaster price changes that have occurred within the past year, fearing that they merely further attest to the increasingly declining international economy. The article notes the astounding fact that "oil prices have fallen 57 percent from their July high of $147 per barrel" and that "Americans in August drove 15 billion fewer miles than they did a year earlier. " This "5.6 percent drop is the largest recorded since 1942." These statistics truly reveal that the rapid price decline may in fact warrant more concern than celebration.

As a result of the unhealthy plummet of the of oil value, OPEC, that is the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, has recently taken the precautionary measure of ordering its member nations to cut oil production by 1.5 million barrels a day. The organization feels that a floor needs to be immediately placed beneath the falling prices before they drop to potentially unsalvageable levels.

In my opinion the recent changes we have witnessed at the gas pumps offer only another testimony to the extremely unstable condition of the current economy and its subsequent need for aid and repair. According to the article, OPEC's recent attempts to limit the prices have thus far proven largely unsuccessful. Indeed this economic predicament has swelled beyond the reach of even the largest regulatory institutions. If big business isn't "big enough" to remedy it, then who?

Oh that's right...our president elect has been making many impressive claims throughout his campaign to turn all of our economic hopes and dreams into reality. Well Mr. Obama, I'm not so sure about realizing hopes and dreams, but a little more stability would be nice...

Ready Set VOTE!

Finally...after seemingly endless campaigning, advertising, deliberation, mud slinging, hair splitting, analyzing and reviewing, that blessed day has arrived. So many of us have watched and waited. Some of us have simply chosen to ignore. I am still not fully convinced as to which has made the wisest choice, but nevertheless we will all be facing the same choice on election day.

As closing arguments were fired today, both McCain and Obama sought to distinguish themselves from their opponent as much as possible, drawing heavily on economic policy differences. While Obama was fighting off accusations of socialism and higher taxes, McCain attempted to further detach himself from the economic policies of George Bush. Each candidate wants to be something new, fresh and dependable for the American people. Undoubtedly the American people will have a difficult decision to make, choosing between an experienced, more predictable and uncompromising leader, and a movement motivated, unpredictable, yet enthusiastic one.

Is the United States up for the gamble? Whatever the outcome, one thing is certain. This has become a very historic election, bringing many firsts for the American people. My feeling is that this election has in store quite a few more firsts for the nation.

Article Found At: http://www.theweek.com/article/index/90357/3/McCain_Obama_Closing_arguments

The Independent Voter

It appears to many disgusted Americans that this political year has proven to illustrate just how polarized the nation's two leading political parties have become. The democratic and republican parties have uncompromisingly sought to define their respective camps as essentially being the antonym of the other. Each has made it their highest priority to place as much space as possible between itself and the opposing party for the purpose of providing voters with clearly labeled leadership options. They would probably prefer that those two options be labeled something like good and evil, though each would undoubtedly differ in their opinion of which is which. Somehow in their efforts to delineate their differences, the democratic and republican parties may have created too great of a chasm between themselves—a chasm that more and more American voters seem to be falling into.

Surprisingly, the Wall Street Journal reported this week that the growing new mainstream in American voters is now, by the numbers, the independent voter. According to an column by John P. Avlon titled "What Independent Voters Want," independents make up about 40% of the electorate in the United States and represent a political majority in six states already. These new numbers represent a resoundingly large and influential group of voters that just can't seem to find a home in either end of the American political spectrum. These voters may be able to accept viewpoints on specific issues from each party, but are unable to find enough common ground allowing them to identify with that party. These branded independent voters find themselves stuck in the middle of two American extremes.

I feel that it is this new emerging conglomerate that will become the essential deciding factor in the upcoming November elections. It has already been reported that a decisive number of these independent voters occupy several swing states including Pennsylvania, Florida, and Ohio. I agree strongly with Avlon in his conclusion that "The next president can unite the country even in difficult times if he understands this truth: Americans are not deeply divided—our political parties are—and the independent voter is a direct reaction to this disconnect." Indeed it is the overly polarized parties that are giving a national allusion of disunity and unrest. It is my feeling that the growing independent constituency is largely unimpressed with the edgy and quarrelsome partisan politics that have grown out of the past few presidential election campaigns. Americans are united—under the assertion that political parties need reform.

This weeks article can be found at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122445963016248615.html